TL;DR
SummaReranker introduces a multi-task mixture-of-experts re-ranking framework that enhances abstractive summarization by selecting superior candidates, significantly improving ROUGE scores across multiple datasets and setting new state-of-the-art results.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel second-stage re-ranking model using mixture-of-experts that improves summarization quality beyond standard fine-tuning methods.
Findings
ROUGE scores improved by 5.44% on CNN-DailyMail
ROUGE scores improved by 1.31% on XSum
ROUGE scores improved by 9.34% on Reddit TIFU
Abstract
Sequence-to-sequence neural networks have recently achieved great success in abstractive summarization, especially through fine-tuning large pre-trained language models on the downstream dataset. These models are typically decoded with beam search to generate a unique summary. However, the search space is very large, and with the exposure bias, such decoding is not optimal. In this paper, we show that it is possible to directly train a second-stage model performing re-ranking on a set of summary candidates. Our mixture-of-experts SummaReranker learns to select a better candidate and consistently improves the performance of the base model. With a base PEGASUS, we push ROUGE scores by 5.44% on CNN-DailyMail (47.16 ROUGE-1), 1.31% on XSum (48.12 ROUGE-1) and 9.34% on Reddit TIFU (29.83 ROUGE-1), reaching a new state-of-the-art. Our code and checkpoints will be available at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsPEGASUS · Balanced Selection
