High-resolution synthetic UV-submm images for Milky Way-mass simulated galaxies from the ARTEMIS project
Peter Camps, Anand Utsav Kapoor, Ana Tr\v{c}ka, Andreea S. Font, Ian, G. McCarthy, James Trayford, and Maarten Baes

TL;DR
This paper provides high-resolution, dust-aware synthetic images of Milky Way-mass galaxies from the ARTEMIS simulation, enabling detailed comparison with observations and previous simulations across multiple wavelengths.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive post-processing pipeline for ARTEMIS galaxies to produce realistic synthetic images from UV to sub-mm, and compares these to observed and other simulated galaxies.
Findings
ARTEMIS galaxies generally reproduce observed flux and property scaling relations
Dust extinction at UV wavelengths is underestimated in the simulations
Simulated galaxies are more clumpy and less symmetrical than observed galaxies
Abstract
We present redshift-zero synthetic dust-aware observations for the 45 Milky Way-mass simulated galaxies of the ARTEMIS project, calculated with the SKIRT radiative transfer code. The post-processing procedure includes components for star-forming regions, stellar sources, and diffuse dust. We produce and publicly release realistic high-resolution images for 50 commonly-used broadband filters from ultraviolet to sub-millimetre wavelengths and for 18 different viewing angles. We compare the simulated ARTEMIS galaxies to observed galaxies in the DustPedia database with similar stellar mass and star formation rate, and to synthetic observations of the simulated galaxies of the Auriga project produced in previous work using a similar post-processing technique. In all cases, global galaxy properties are derived using SED fitting. We find that, similar to Auriga, the post-processed ARTEMIS…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
