Processing Induced Distinct Charge Carrier Dynamics of Bulky Organic Halide Treated Perovskites

TL;DR

This study investigates how bulky organic halide treatments affect charge carrier dynamics in perovskites, revealing distinct interfacial behaviors and their impact on solar cell performance, with implications for manufacturing robustness.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of the interfacial effects of AX versus A2PbX4 passivation in perovskites using TRPL, X-ray diffraction, and microscopy, highlighting their different mechanisms and processing windows.

Findings

AX passivation enhances photoluminescence quantum yield.

AX induces phase mixing, altering carrier dynamics.

A2PbI4 passivation is limited to surface regions.

Abstract

State-of-the-art metal halide perovskite-based photovoltaics often employ organic ammonium salts, AX, as a surface passivator, where A is a large organic cation and X is a halide. These surface treatments passivate the perovskite by forming layered perovskites (e.g., A2PbX4) or by AX itself serving as a surface passivation agent on the perovskite photoactive film. It remains unclear whether layered perovskites or AX is the ideal passivator due to an incomplete understanding of the interfacial impact and resulting photoexcited carrier dynamics of AX treatment. In the present study, we use TRPL measurements to selectively probe the different interfaces of glass/perovskite/AX to demonstrate the vastly distinct interfacial photoexcited state dynamics with the presence of A2PbX4 or AX. Coupling the TRPL results with X-ray diffraction and nanoscale microscopy measurements, we find that the presence of AX not only passivates the traps at the surface and the grain boundaries, but also induces an {\alpha}/{\delta}-FAPbI3 phase mixing that alters the carrier dynamics near the glass/perovskite interface and enhances the photoluminescence quantum yield. In contrast, the passivation with A2PbI4 is mostly localized to the surface and grain boundaries near the top surface where the availability of PbI2 directly determines the formation of A2PbI4. Such distinct mechanisms significantly impact the corresponding solar cell performance, and we find AX passivation that has not been converted to a layered perovskite allows for a much larger processing window (e.g., larger allowed variance of AX concentration which is critical for improving the eventual manufacturing yield) and more reproducible condition to realize device performance improvements, while A2PbI4 as a passivator yields a much narrower processing window. We expect these results to enable a more rational route for developing AX for perovskite.