
TL;DR
This paper models the dynamics of collective memory using a two-phase decay process, distinguishing between short-term communicative memory and long-term cultural memory, with implications for managing public discourse.
Contribution
It introduces a two-step decay model for collective memory, highlighting the transition from communicative to cultural memory and its practical implications.
Findings
Memory decay follows a two-phase process with an initial rapid decline followed by a slower decline.
A transition point exists where cultural memory surpasses communicative memory.
The model offers insights for policymakers to manage community conversations.
Abstract
Collective memory is a common representation of the past shared by a group of people that modulates its identity. Recent literature on computational social science quantifies collective memories using expressions of those memories operationalized as the amount of collective attention focused on specific cultural icons, either artifacts or people. We model the temporal dynamics of collective memory using a two-step decay process, characterized by a short-lived and intense initial stage followed by a long-lived and milder decline of collective attention. Different collective memory mechanisms sustain the two-step process. The first is communicative memory, which corresponds to all memories supported by socializing acts. The second is cultural memory, which corresponds to all memories sustained by accessing records. Thus, this model predicts a transition time when cultural memory overcomes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
