Event Weighting vs. Event Counting
Joerg Pretz

TL;DR
This paper introduces an event weighting method in particle physics that assigns importance-based weights to events, improving statistical analysis and closely relating to maximum likelihood techniques, demonstrated through beam polarization extraction.
Contribution
It presents an educational overview of event weighting, highlighting its advantages over simple counting and its connection to maximum likelihood methods.
Findings
Event weighting improves statistical precision in particle physics analyses.
The method is demonstrated through beam polarization extraction example.
Event weighting relates closely to maximum likelihood estimation.
Abstract
Goal of these proceedings is to introduce a method based on event weighting in particle physics experiments. Weighting means that events are not just counted as integer numbers but are assigned a weight factor according to their importance in the analysis. This method has a close connection to the maximum likelihood method known to reach the smallest statistical error. The purpose of this document is to give a more educational overview on the subject. As an example the extraction of a beam polarization from scattered particles is discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
