Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta-analysis
Christian R\"over, Tim Friede

TL;DR
This paper critiques the use of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transform in meta-analysis, highlighting its mathematical issues that compromise its reliability for combining proportions.
Contribution
The authors demonstrate that the double arcsine transform has fundamental problems with monotonicity and invertibility, making it unsuitable for meta-analytical applications.
Findings
Identifies issues with monotonicity in the transform
Shows problems with invertibility affecting meta-analysis
Recommends against using the transform for meta-analytical purposes
Abstract
The variance-stabilizing Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transform was originally proposed for inference on single proportions. Subsequently, its use has been suggested in the context of meta-analysis of proportions. While some erratic behaviour has been observed previously, here we point out and illustrate general issues of monotonicity and invertibility that make this transform unsuitable for meta-analysis purposes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Optimal Experimental Design Methods
