Geometric Assumptions in Hydrodynamic Modeling of Coronal and Flaring Loops
Jeffrey W. Reep, Ignacio Ugarte-Urra, Harry P. Warren, Will T. Barnes

TL;DR
This paper investigates how assumptions about loop geometry, especially cross-sectional expansion, affect hydrodynamic and radiative modeling of coronal and flaring loops, highlighting the importance of accurate geometric considerations.
Contribution
It provides a direct analysis of how cross-sectional expansion and loop eccentricity influence loop dynamics, cooling, and spectral emissions, challenging standard assumptions.
Findings
Expanding cross-section lengthens cooling and draining times.
Standard radiative cooling relation T ~ n^2 does not hold for expanding loops.
Spectral line intensities decrease with larger expansion, affecting observational diagnostics.
Abstract
In coronal loop modeling, it is commonly assumed that the loops are semi-circular with a uniform cross-sectional area. However, observed loops are rarely semi-circular, and extrapolations of the magnetic field show that the field strength decreases with height, implying that the cross-sectional area expands with height. We examine these two assumptions directly to understand how they affect the hydrodynamic and radiative response of short, hot loops to strong, impulsive electron beam heating events. Both the magnitude and rate of area expansion impact the dynamics directly, and an expanding cross-section significantly lengthens the time for a loop to cool and drain, increases upflow durations, and suppresses sound waves. The standard relation for radiative cooling does not hold with expanding loops, which cool with relatively little draining. An increase in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
