Localization Schemes: A Framework for Proving Mixing Bounds for Markov Chains
Yuansi Chen, Ronen Eldan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unified framework connecting Spectral and Stochastic Localization techniques to analyze Markov chain mixing times, simplifying proofs and deriving new bounds such as an $O(n \, \log n)$ mixing time for Glauber dynamics.
Contribution
It unifies two recent techniques into a single framework using localization schemes, simplifying analysis and extending results in Markov chain mixing time bounds.
Findings
Unified framework for Spectral and Stochastic Localization techniques.
Simplified proofs of existing mixing bounds.
First $O(n \log n)$ mixing time bound for Glauber dynamics in certain models.
Abstract
Two recent and seemingly-unrelated techniques for proving mixing bounds for Markov chains are: (i) the framework of Spectral Independence, introduced by Anari, Liu and Oveis Gharan, and its numerous extensions, which have given rise to several breakthroughs in the analysis of mixing times of discrete Markov chains and (ii) the Stochastic Localization technique which has proven useful in establishing mixing and expansion bounds for both log-concave measures and for measures on the discrete hypercube. In this paper, we introduce a framework which connects ideas from both techniques. Our framework unifies, simplifies and extends those two techniques. In its center is the concept of a localization scheme which, to every probability measure, assigns a martingale of probability measures which localize in space as time evolves. As it turns out, to every such scheme corresponds a Markov chain,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods · Statistical Methods and Inference · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
