Reply to Galilean invariance without superluminal particles
Andrzej Dragan, Artur Ekert
TL;DR
This paper defends previous claims linking quantum theory and special relativity in superluminal frames against criticisms, clarifying misunderstandings about Galilean invariance without implying superluminal particles.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal to criticisms of their earlier work, clarifying the theoretical connection between quantum mechanics and relativity in superluminal contexts.
Findings
Criticisms are refuted with theoretical arguments
Clarification of Galilean invariance in superluminal frames
Reinforcement of the link between quantum theory and relativity
Abstract
In a recent comment [arXiv:2112.05658], Grudka and W\'ojcik object to some of our earlier claims concerning a link between fundamental postulates of quantum theory and special relativity extended to superluminal frames of reference. In this short reply we refute these criticisms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum optics and atomic interactions · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum Mechanics and Applications