Comment on "Quantum principle of relativity"
Flavio Del Santo, Sebastian Horvat

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent claim that quantum properties can be derived from relativity by showing the original arguments are flawed and do not support the conclusions.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis demonstrating the invalidity of deriving quantum principles solely from relativistic considerations involving superluminal frames.
Findings
The original argument is flawed and does not establish quantum properties from relativity.
Superluminal reference frames do not justify deriving quantum indeterminism and superposition.
The claims in the original paper are unwarranted based on the critique.
Abstract
A. Dragan and A. Ekert [New Journal of Physics, 22(3), p.033038.] have recently claimed that fundamental properties of quantum physics (e.g. fundamental indeterminism and the principle of superposition) can be derived solely from relativistic considerations, if one takes as physically meaningful superluminal reference frames. In this comment we show that their arguments are flawed and their claims therefore unwarranted.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science
