Machine Learning to identify ICL and BCG in simulated galaxy clusters
I. Marini, S. Borgani, A. Saro, G. Murante, G.L. Granato, C., Ragone-Figueroa, G. Taffoni

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a supervised Random Forest classifier can effectively distinguish between Brightest Cluster Galaxy and IntraCluster Light stars in simulated galaxy clusters, offering a faster alternative to traditional methods.
Contribution
The study introduces a machine learning approach using Random Forests to classify stellar components in galaxy cluster simulations, showing robustness across different resolutions, redshifts, and astrophysical models.
Findings
High accuracy in classifying stars with most errors at BCG outskirts.
Classifier remains robust up to redshift z=1 and across different simulation resolutions.
Identified transition radius between BCG and ICL at 0.04 r200.
Abstract
Nowadays, Machine Learning techniques offer fast and efficient solutions for classification problems that would require intensive computational resources via traditional methods. We examine the use of a supervised Random Forest to classify stars in simulated galaxy clusters after subtracting the member galaxies. These dynamically different components are interpreted as the individual properties of the stars in the Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG) and IntraCluster Light (ICL). We employ matched stellar catalogues (built from the different dynamical properties of BCG and ICL) of 29 simulated clusters from the DIANOGA set to train and test the classifier. The input features are cluster mass, normalized particle cluster-centric distance, and rest-frame velocity. The model is found to correctly identify most of the stars, while the larger errors are exhibited at the BCG outskirt, where the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
