Comparison of evolving interfaces, triple points, and quadruple points for discrete and diffuse interface methods
Erdem Eren, Brandon Runnels, Jeremy Mason

TL;DR
This paper compares discrete and diffuse interface methods for modeling microstructure evolution, demonstrating that the discrete method can achieve comparable or better accuracy with potentially lower computational cost.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison between a new discrete interface method and traditional multiphase field methods for complex interface topologies.
Findings
Discrete method matches or outperforms multiphase field in accuracy
Discrete method requires fewer grid points for similar accuracy
Discrete method shows promise for efficient microstructure simulations
Abstract
The evolution of interfaces is intrinsic to many physical processes ranging from cavitation in fluids to recrystallization in solids. Computational modeling of interface motion entails a number of challenges, many of which are related to the range of topological transitions that can occur over the course of the simulation. Microstructure evolution in a polycrystalline material that involves grain boundary motion is a particularly complex example due to the extreme variety, heterogeneity, and anisotropy of grain boundary properties. Accurately modeling this process is essential to determining processing-structure-property relationships in polycrystalline materials though. Simulations of microstructure evolution in such materials often use diffuse interface methods like the phase field method that are advantageous for their versatility and ease of handling complex geometries but can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
