Election in Fully Anonymous Shared Memory Systems: Tight Space Bounds and Algorithms
Damien Imbs, Michel Raynal, Gadi Taubenfeld

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fundamental limits and algorithms for election problems in fully anonymous asynchronous shared memory systems, focusing on space complexity bounds and the design of efficient solutions.
Contribution
It provides tight space bounds and novel algorithms for $d$-election and exact $d$-election in anonymous shared memory systems, addressing both memory and process anonymity.
Findings
Established tight space bounds for election algorithms
Developed algorithms for $d$-election and exact $d$-election
Analyzed the impact of anonymity on memory requirements
Abstract
This article addresses election in fully anonymous systems made up of asynchronous processes that communicate through atomic read-write registers or atomic read-modify-write registers. Given an integer , two elections problems are considered: -election (at least one and at most processes are elected) and exact -election (exactly processes are elected). Full anonymity means that both the processes and the shared registers are anonymous. Memory anonymity means that the processes may disagree on the names of the shared registers. That is, the same register name can denote different registers for different processes, and the register name used by a process and the register name used by another process can address the same shared register.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptography and Data Security · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Distributed systems and fault tolerance
