Online List Labeling: Breaking the $\log^2n$ Barrier

TL;DR

This paper introduces a randomized data structure for online list labeling that surpasses the longstanding $O( ext{log}^2 n)$ barrier, achieving an expected relabeling cost of $O( ext{log}^{3/2} n)$, and proves this bound is optimal for history-independent solutions.

Contribution

The paper presents the first randomized list labeling algorithm with expected $O( ext{log}^{3/2} n)$ cost, breaking the $O( ext{log}^2 n)$ barrier, and establishes a matching lower bound for history-independent methods.

Findings

Achieves $O( ext{log}^{3/2} n)$ expected relabeling cost.

Proves the lower bound $ heta( ext{log}^{3/2} n)$ for history-independent algorithms.

Extends results to cases where $m = (1 + ext{constant}) n$.

Abstract

The online list labeling problem is an algorithmic primitive with a large literature of upper bounds, lower bounds, and applications. The goal is to store a dynamically-changing set of $n$ items in an array of $m$ slots, while maintaining the invariant that the items appear in sorted order, and while minimizing the relabeling cost, defined to be the number of items that are moved per insertion/deletion. For the linear regime, where $m = (1 + \Theta(1)) n$, an upper bound of $O(\log^2 n)$ on the relabeling cost has been known since 1981. A lower bound of $\Omega(\log^2 n)$ is known for deterministic algorithms and for so-called smooth algorithms, but the best general lower bound remains $\Omega(\log n)$. The central open question in the field is whether $O(\log^2 n)$ is optimal for all algorithms. In this paper, we give a randomized data structure that achieves an expected relabeling cost of $O(\log^{3/2} n)$ per operation. More generally, if $m = (1 + \varepsilon) n$ for $\varepsilon = O(1)$, the expected relabeling cost becomes $O(\varepsilon^{-1} \log^{3/2} n)$. Our solution is history independent, meaning that the state of the data structure is independent of the order in which items are inserted/deleted. For history-independent data structures, we also prove a matching lower bound: for all $\epsilon$ between $1 / n^{1/3}$ and some sufficiently small positive constant, the optimal expected cost for history-independent list-labeling solutions is $\Theta(\varepsilon^{-1}\log^{3/2} n)$.