Improving sandwich variance estimation for marginal Cox analysis of cluster randomized trials
Xueqi Wang, Elizabeth L. Turner, and Fan Li

TL;DR
This paper develops and evaluates nine bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators for the marginal Cox model in small-sample cluster randomized trials with survival data, improving inference accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces new bias-corrected variance estimators specifically for clustered survival data analyzed by the marginal Cox model, addressing a gap in small-sample correction methods.
Findings
Optimal estimator varies with cluster size variability.
Bias corrections can significantly alter inference outcomes.
New estimators improve small-sample inference accuracy.
Abstract
Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) frequently recruit a small number of clusters, therefore necessitating the application of small-sample corrections for valid inference. A recent systematic review indicated that CRTs reporting right-censored, time-to-event outcomes are not uncommon, and that the marginal Cox proportional hazards model is one of the common approaches used for primary analysis. While small-sample corrections have been studied under marginal models with continuous, binary and count outcomes, no prior research has been devoted to the development and evaluation of bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators when clustered time-to-event outcomes are analyzed by the marginal Cox model. To improve current practice, we propose 9 bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators for the analysis of CRTs using the marginal Cox model, and report on a simulation study to evaluate their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
