Improved upper limit on degree-scale CMB B-mode polarization power from the 670 square-degree POLARBEAR survey
The POLARBEAR Collaboration: S. Adachi, T. Adkins, M. A. O. Aguilar, Fa\'undez, K. S. Arnold, C. Baccigalupi, D. Barron, S. Chapman, K. Cheung, Y., Chinone, K. T. Crowley, T. Elleflot, J. Errard, G. Fabbian, C. Feng, T., Fujino, N. Galitzki, N. W. Halverson, M. Hasegawa

TL;DR
This paper presents an improved measurement of the CMB B-mode polarization power spectrum over 670 square degrees, utilizing an enhanced data analysis method to better constrain the tensor-to-scalar ratio and foreground contamination.
Contribution
The study introduces an angle-correction algorithm that increases data volume and improves the measurement of the CMB B-mode spectrum from POLARBEAR data.
Findings
Measured B-mode spectrum consistent with ΛCDM and dust foregrounds
Placed an upper limit on tensor-to-scalar ratio r < 0.33
Enhanced data analysis increased data volume by 1.8 times
Abstract
We report an improved measurement of the degree-scale cosmic microwave background -mode angular-power spectrum over 670 square-degree sky area at 150 GHz with POLARBEAR. In the original analysis of the data, errors in the angle measurement of the continuously rotating half-wave plate, a polarization modulator, caused significant data loss. By introducing an angle-correction algorithm, the data volume is increased by a factor of 1.8. We report a new analysis using the larger data set. We find the measured -mode spectrum is consistent with the CDM model with Galactic dust foregrounds. We estimate the contamination of the foreground by cross-correlating our data and Planck 143, 217, and 353 GHz measurements, where its spectrum is modeled as a power law in angular scale and a modified blackbody in frequency. We place an upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio < 0.33 at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
