Postcertificates for Revocation Transparency
Nikita Korzhitskii, Matus Nemec, Niklas Carlsson

TL;DR
The paper introduces a practical revocation transparency protocol using postcertificates and existing Certificate Transparency logs, enhancing trust, accountability, and control in certificate revocation processes.
Contribution
It proposes a novel revocation transparency protocol leveraging postcertificates and CT logs, enabling autonomous revocation and improved CA accountability.
Findings
Protocol is practical and low-cost to deploy.
Provides immutable revocation history and transparency.
Enables certificate owners to control revocation independently.
Abstract
The modern Internet is highly dependent on trust communicated via certificates. However, in some cases, certificates become untrusted, and it is necessary to revoke them. In practice, the problem of secure revocation is still open. Furthermore, the existing procedures do not leave a transparent and immutable revocation history. We propose and evaluate a new revocation transparency protocol that introduces postcertificates and utilizes the existing Certificate Transparency (CT) logs. The protocol is practical, has a low deployment cost, provides an immutable history of revocations, enables delegation, and helps to detect revocation-related misbehavior by certificate authorities (CAs). With this protocol, a holder of a postcertificate can bypass the issuing CA and autonomously initiate the revocation process via submission of the postcertificate to a CT log. The CAs are required to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAccess Control and Trust · Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services · Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
