Online Balanced Experimental Design
David Arbour, Drew Dimmery, Tung Mai, Anup Rao

TL;DR
This paper introduces online algorithms for experimental design that minimize covariate imbalance and variance, improving precision and robustness in randomized experiments with multiple treatments.
Contribution
It presents computationally efficient online algorithms that handle arbitrary treatment probabilities, incorporate randomization, and provide theoretical bounds on estimation error.
Findings
Algorithms outperform complete randomization in simulations
Proposed methods achieve lower covariate imbalance
Theoretical bounds are within a logarithmic factor of offline optimal
Abstract
e consider the experimental design problem in an online environment, an important practical task for reducing the variance of estimates in randomized experiments which allows for greater precision, and in turn, improved decision making. In this work, we present algorithms that build on recent advances in online discrepancy minimization which accommodate both arbitrary treatment probabilities and multiple treatments. The proposed algorithms are computational efficient, minimize covariate imbalance, and include randomization which enables robustness to misspecification. We provide worst case bounds on the expected mean squared error of the causal estimate and show that the proposed estimator is no worse than an implicit ridge regression, which are within a logarithmic factor of the best known results for offline experimental design. We conclude with a detailed simulation study showing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms · Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
