Recovery time of a plasma-wakefield accelerator
R. D'Arcy, J. Chappell, J. Beinortaite, S. Diederichs, G. Boyle, B., Foster, M. J. Garland, P. Gonzalez Caminal, C. A. Lindstr{\o}m, G. Loisch, S., Schreiber, S. Schr\"oder, R. J. Shalloo, M. Th\'evenet, S. Wesch, M. Wing,, and J. Osterhoff

TL;DR
This study measures the plasma recovery time after wakefield excitation, indicating that plasma accelerators could operate at megahertz repetition rates, enabling high-energy particle acceleration at high frequencies.
Contribution
The paper provides the first experimental measurement of plasma recovery time, demonstrating the potential for high-repetition-rate plasma wakefield acceleration.
Findings
Plasma recovery time is on the order of many nanoseconds.
Experimental results align with simulations of a parabolic ion channel.
High repetition rates of megahertz are feasible for plasma accelerators.
Abstract
The interaction of intense particle bunches with plasma can give rise to plasma wakes capable of sustaining gigavolt-per-metre electric fields, which are orders of magnitude higher than provided by state-of-the-art radio-frequency technology. Plasma wakefields can, therefore, strongly accelerate charged particles and offer the opportunity to reach higher particle energies with smaller and hence more widely available accelerator facilities. However, the luminosity and brilliance demands of high-energy physics and photon science require particle bunches to be accelerated at repetition rates of thousands or even millions per second, which are orders of magnitude higher than demonstrated with plasma-wakefield technology. Here we investigate the upper limit on repetition rates of beam-driven plasma accelerators by measuring the time it takes for the plasma to recover to its initial state…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
