Accurate Metallicities for Very Metal-Poor Stars from the Ca~II Infrared Triplet
Y. Osorio, D. S. Aguado, C. Allende-Prieto, I. Hubeny, J. I., Gonzalez-Hernandez

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that the Ca II infrared triplet, when modeled with Non-LTE corrections, provides accurate metallicity estimates for extremely metal-poor stars, overcoming previous limitations of interstellar absorption and LTE assumptions.
Contribution
The paper introduces a Non-LTE modeling approach for the Ca II infrared triplet, enabling reliable metallicity measurements down to [Fe/H] = -6.0 in extremely metal-poor stars.
Findings
Non-LTE corrections can exceed 0.5 dex for the triplet lines.
Agreement between triplet and resonance line abundances is excellent when interstellar absorption is accounted for.
The method allows metallicity measurements at very low levels, aiding primitive star discovery.
Abstract
The Ca~II H \& K lines are among the few features available to infer the metallicity of extremely metal-poor stars from medium-resolution spectroscopy. Unfortunately, these lines can overlap with absorption produced in the intervening interstellar medium, introducing systematic errors in the derived metallicities. The strength of the Ca~II infrared triplet lines can also be measured at extremely low metallicities, and it is not affected by interstellar absorption, but suffers significant departures from Local Thermodynamical Equilibrium (LTE). We investigate the feasibility of adopting the Ca~II infrared triplet as a metallicity indicator in extremely metal-poor stars using state-of-the art Non-LTE models including the most recent atomic data. We find that the triplet lines exhibit Non-LTE abundance corrections that can exceed 0.5\,dex. When interstellar absorption affecting the Ca~II…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
