Is Our Research Productivity In Decline? A New Approach in Resolving the Controversy
Gennady Shkliarevsky

TL;DR
This paper addresses the controversy over research productivity by proposing a new, process-oriented global indicator approach, emphasizing the creation process to better assess knowledge production.
Contribution
It introduces a novel perspective focusing on the creation process and advocates for global indicators to resolve the research productivity controversy.
Findings
Current indicators are unreliable and limited.
A process-based, global perspective offers a clearer view.
Steps are outlined to improve research productivity.
Abstract
This contribution examines the current controversy over research productivity. There are two sides in this controversy. Using extensive data from several industries and areas of research, one side argues that research productivity is currently in decline. The other side disputes this conclusion. It contends that the data used in making this argument are selective and limited; they do not reflect the overall state of research. The conclusion that follows from this critique is that the indicators of research productivity we currently use are not reliable and do not warrant a definitive answer to the problem. The article agrees that we need a new set of indicators in assessing research productivity. It proposes that we should look at global indicators related to knowledge production in general, rather than look at selective data that are inevitably limited in their scope. The article…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic Growth and Productivity
