Comments on "Direct measurement of the ionization quenching factor of nuclear recoils in germanium in the keV energy range"
J.I. Collar, C.M. Lewis

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent germanium quenching factor measurement, highlighting potential inaccuracies and their implications for neutrino property studies, emphasizing the importance of proper calibration and model selection.
Contribution
It identifies key issues in the measurement process and discusses how these affect interpretations of neutrino electromagnetic properties.
Findings
Potential underestimation of energy scale uncertainty
Instrumental non-linearity significantly impacts low-energy QF
QF model choice influences neutrino electromagnetic property conclusions
Abstract
We examine a recent measurement of the quenching factor (QF) in germanium at 80 K, noticing a number of inconsistencies capable of affecting a claimed agreement with Lindhard's ion-stopping formalism in the sub-keV nuclear recoil energy regime. Namely, an underestimated uncertainty in the energy scale and a missing correction for a large instrumental non-linearity in this scale able to severely distort the QF behavior at low energy, favoring reduced values. The discussion is expanded to inspect the impact of QF model selection on a study of neutrino electromagnetic properties using CENS data that supports a non-zero electric charge at the 3.5 level.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
