Accuracy of Garmin GPS Running Watches over Repetitive Trials on the Same Route

TL;DR

This study evaluates the accuracy of three Garmin GPS running watches over repeated trials on the same route, revealing that newer models may sacrifice measurement precision for smaller size and longer battery life.

Contribution

It provides a comparative analysis of GPS accuracy across different Garmin watch generations using consistent testing conditions over several years.

Findings

Older watches showed similar accuracy

Newer watch was less accurate in distance measurement

Device design choices may impact GPS accuracy

Abstract

Many runners use watches incorporating Global Positioning System technology to track their workouts. These devices can be valuable training aids, but they have limitations. For several reasons including variations in satellite position, environmental factors, and design decisions made by the manufacturer, GPS-enabled watches can produce position measurement errors. These can result in incorrect estimations of total distance covered as well as running pace. This study examined the accuracy of three Garmin running watches of different technological generations using repetitive trials, over several years, by the same runner over the same route. The older watches, a Forerunner 205 and a Forerunner 220, showed similar accuracy when traversing the route. The newer generation watch, a Forerunner 45S, was found to be significantly less accurate in terms of both the trueness and precision of its distance measurements. This may indicate that Garmin, in competition with other manufacturers of similar devices, has chosen in recent years to prioritize device miniaturization and battery life over accuracy.