On closed subgroups of precompact groups
Salvador Hern\'andez, Dieter Remus, F. Javier Trigos-Arrieta

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the choice of continuous homomorphisms influences the topological properties of subgroups within precompact groups, advancing understanding of subgroup closure and simplicity in totally bounded Abelian groups.
Contribution
It explores the impact of homomorphism sets on subgroup topology, addressing the number of topologies making subgroups closed and the structure of S-closed subgroup posets.
Findings
Characterized the influence of homomorphism sets on subgroup closure.
Determined conditions for the existence of maximal and minimal S-closed subgroup topologies.
Analyzed the number of topologies making a group topologically simple or SC.
Abstract
It is a Theorem of W.~ W. Comfort and K.~ A. Ross that if is a subgroup of a compact Abelian group, and denotes those continuous homomorphisms from to the one-dimensional torus, then the topology on is the initial topology given by . {Assume that is a subgroup of . We study how} the choice of affects the topological placement and properties of in . Among other results, we have {made significant} progress toward the solution of the following specific questions: How many totally bounded group topologies does admit such that is a closed (dense) subgroup? If denotes the poset of all subgroups of that are -closed, ordered by inclusion, does has a greatest (resp. smallest) element? We say that a totally bounded (topological, resp.) group is an \textit{SC-group} (\textit{topologically simple}, resp.) if all its subgroups are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
