Combination of survival movement strategies in cyclic game systems during an epidemic

TL;DR

This study explores how combining movement strategies like social distancing and avoiding disease vectors enhances territorial dominance in a cyclic five-species ecosystem during an epidemic, revealing complex effects on population dynamics.

Contribution

It introduces a novel analysis of combined survival movement strategies in a cyclic game system under epidemic conditions, highlighting their impact on pattern formation and species dominance.

Findings

Combining movement strategies maximizes territorial control.

Avoiding disease vectors alone does not significantly increase populations.

Social distancing combined with other tactics improves survival and dominance.

Abstract

Disease outbreaks affect many ecosystems threatening species that also fight against other natural enemies. We investigate a cyclic game system with $5$ species, whose organisms outcompete according to the rules of a generalised spatial rock-paper-scissors game, during an epidemic. We study the effects of behavioural movement strategies that allow individuals of one out of the species to move towards areas with a low density of disease vectors and a high concentration of enemies of their enemies. We perform a series of stochastic simulations to discover the impact of self-preservation strategies in pattern formation, calculating the species' spatial autocorrelation functions. Considering organisms with different physical and cognitive abilities, we compute the benefits of each movement tactic to reduce selection and infection risks. Our findings show that the maximum profit in terms of territorial dominance in the cyclic game is achieved if both survival movement strategies are combined, with individuals prioritising social distancing. In the case of an epidemic causing symptomatic illness, the drop in infection risk when organisms identify and avoid disease vectors does not render a rise in the species population because many refuges are disregarded, limiting the benefits of safeguarding against natural enemies. Our results may be helpful to the understanding of the behavioural strategies in ecosystems where organisms adapt to face living conditions changes.