On the relevance of bandwidth extension for speaker identification
Marcos Faundez-Zanuy, Mattias Nilsson, W. Bastiaan Kleijn

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether bandwidth extension improves speaker identification accuracy by analyzing extended telephone bandwidth speech signals, demonstrating that MELCEPST features benefit from bandwidth extension in certain scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a study on the impact of bandwidth extension on speaker recognition, including the creation of new databases and evaluation of feature parameterizations.
Findings
MELCEPST features benefit from bandwidth extension.
Bandwidth extension can improve speaker identification in specific conditions.
Created databases for bandwidth extended speech analysis.
Abstract
In this paper we discuss the relevance of bandwidth extension for speaker identification tasks. Mainly we want to study if it is possible to recognize voices that have been bandwith extended. For this purpose, we created two different databases (microphonic and ISDN) of speech signals that were bandwidth extended from telephone bandwidth ([300, 3400] Hz) to full bandwidth ([100, 8000] Hz). We have evaluated different parameterizations, and we have found that the MELCEPST parameterization can take advantage of the bandwidth extension algorithms in several situations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech and Audio Processing · Speech Recognition and Synthesis · Advanced Data Compression Techniques
