A Minimal Deductive System for RDFS with Negative Statements
Umberto Straccia, Giovanni Casini

TL;DR
This paper extends RDFS to handle negative statements under the Open World Assumption by introducing a minimal, syntactic extension that preserves compatibility with existing reasoners and ensures satisfiability.
Contribution
It proposes a novel minimal extension of RDFS, called a ho df_ot^ egb, enabling negative statement reasoning without reification and maintaining compatibility with standard reasoners.
Findings
a ho df_ot^ egb remains syntactically a triple language.
Knowledge bases in a ho df_ot^ egb are always satisfiable.
Entailment decision complexity ranges from P to NP.
Abstract
The triple language RDFS is designed to represent and reason with \emph{positive} statements only (e.g."antipyretics are drugs"). In this paper we show how to extend RDFS to express and reason with various forms of negative statements under the Open World Assumption (OWA). To do so, we start from , a minimal, but significant RDFS fragment that covers all essential features of RDFS, and then extend it to , allowing express also statements such as "radio therapies are non drug treatments", "Ebola has no treatment", or "opioids and antipyretics are disjoint classes". The main and, to the best of our knowledge, unique features of our proposal are: (i) remains syntactically a triple language by extending with new symbols with specific semantics and there is no need to revert to the reification method to represent negative triples;…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Topic Modeling
MethodsBalanced Selection · Network On Network
