Perceptions of the State of D&I and D&I Initiative in the ASF
Mariam Guizani, Bianca Trinkenreich, Aileen Abril Castro-Guzman, Igor, Steinmacher, Marco Gerosa, Anita Sarma

TL;DR
This study investigates OSS contributors' perceptions of D&I initiatives within the ASF, revealing perceived shortcomings and areas for improvement to foster more inclusive open source communities.
Contribution
It provides empirical insights into contributors' perceptions of D&I efforts in OSS, highlighting specific areas needing enhancement and offering guidance for future initiatives.
Findings
Contributors see D&I as lacking, especially in gender, seniority, and language.
Some perceive D&I efforts as unnecessary; others critique their implementation.
D&I initiatives are a good start but require significant improvements.
Abstract
Open Source Software (OSS) Foundations and projects are investing in creating Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) initiatives. However, little is known about contributors' perceptions about the usefulness and success of such initiatives. We aim to close this gap by investigating how contributors perceive the state of D&I in their community. In collaboration with the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), we surveyed 600+ OSS contributors and conducted 11 follow-up interviews. We used mixed methods to analyze our data-quantitative analysis of Likert-scale questions and qualitative analysis of open-ended survey question and the interviews to understand contributors' perceptions and critiques of the D&I initiative and how to improve it. Our results indicate that the ASF contributors felt that the state of D&I was still lacking, especially regarding gender, seniority, and English proficiency.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
