Modeling the propagation of tumor fronts with shortest path and diffusion models -- implications for the definition of the clinical target volume
Thomas Bortfeld, Gregory Buti

TL;DR
This study compares the shortest path and reaction-diffusion models for defining tumor spread beyond visible tumors, aiming to improve the objectivity and scientific basis of clinical target volume delineation in radiation therapy.
Contribution
It introduces a mathematical comparison of two tumor spread models, highlighting the reaction-diffusion model's potential as an alternative to traditional margin-based methods.
Findings
Both models produce similar tumor front shapes.
Diffusion model yields smoother tumor fronts.
Anatomical barriers affect diffusion-based fronts.
Abstract
Objective: The overarching objective is to make the definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) in radiation oncology less subjective and more scientifically based. The specific objective of this study is to investigate similarities and differences between two methods that model tumor spread beyond the visible gross tumor volume (GTV): 1. The shortest path model, which is the standard method of adding a geometric GTV-CTV margin, and 2. The reaction-diffusion model. Approach: These two models to capture the invisible tumor "fire front" are defined and compared in mathematical terms. The models are applied to example cases that represent tumor spread in non-uniform and anisotropic media with anatomical barriers. Main Results: The two seemingly disparate models bring forth traveling waves that can be associated with the front of tumor growth outward from the GTV. The shape of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
