On $p$-gonal fields of definition
Ruben A. Hidalgo

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fields over which p-gonal Riemann surfaces can be defined, providing bounds on the degree of field extensions needed for such definitions, especially when automorphisms are also definable over the base field.
Contribution
It establishes bounds on the degree of field extensions required to define p-gonal surfaces and automorphisms, generalizing known results for hyperelliptic cases to higher primes.
Findings
Existence of a field extension of degree at most 2(p-1) for defining the surface as y^p=F(x)
If automorphism is definable over the base field, extension degree can be at most 2
Special case for p=2 recovers known hyperelliptic results
Abstract
Let be a closed Riemann surface of genus and be a conformal automorphism of of prime order such that has genus zero. Let be a field of definition of . We provide an argument for the existence of a field extension of , of degree at most , for which is definable by a curve of the form , in which case corresponds to . If, moreover, is also definable over , then can be chosen to be at most a quadratic extension of . For , that is when is hyperelliptic and is its hyperelliptic involution, this fact is due to Mestre (for even genus) and Huggins and Lercier-Ritzenthaler-Sijslingit in the case that ${\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
