Systematic review of deep learning and machine learning for building energy

TL;DR

This paper systematically reviews machine learning and deep learning techniques for building energy management, evaluating their performance and robustness in energy demand, consumption, and load forecasting.

Contribution

It offers a comprehensive taxonomy and performance evaluation of ML and DL methods applied to building energy systems, highlighting promising models and robustness levels.

Findings

Hybrid and ensemble methods show high robustness in demand forecasting.

DL-based and hybrid models excel in energy consumption prediction.

ANN and SVM models demonstrate good robustness in various energy forecasting tasks.

Abstract

The building energy (BE) management has an essential role in urban sustainability and smart cities. Recently, the novel data science and data-driven technologies have shown significant progress in analyzing the energy consumption and energy demand data sets for a smarter energy management. The machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods and applications, in particular, have been promising for the advancement of the accurate and high-performance energy models. The present study provides a comprehensive review of ML and DL-based techniques applied for handling BE systems, and it further evaluates the performance of these techniques. Through a systematic review and a comprehensive taxonomy, the advances of ML and DL-based techniques are carefully investigated, and the promising models are introduced. According to the results obtained for energy demand forecasting, the hybrid and ensemble methods are located in high robustness range, SVM-based methods are located in good robustness limitation, ANN-based methods are located in medium robustness limitation and linear regression models are located in low robustness limitations. On the other hand, for energy consumption forecasting, DL-based, hybrid, and ensemble-based models provided the highest robustness score. ANN, SVM, and single ML models provided good and medium robustness and LR-based models provided the lower robustness score. In addition, for energy load forecasting, LR-based models provided the lower robustness score. The hybrid and ensemble-based models provided a higher robustness score. The DL-based and SVM-based techniques provided a good robustness score and ANN-based techniques provided a medium robustness score.