Bounding Membership Inference
Anvith Thudi, Ilia Shumailov, Franziska Boenisch, Nicolas Papernot

TL;DR
This paper derives a tighter theoretical bound on membership inference attack success under differential privacy and proposes a subsampling scheme to improve privacy-utility trade-offs.
Contribution
It introduces a new bound on MI attack accuracy for DP-trained models and a subsampling method to reduce MI vulnerability effectively.
Findings
Subsampling significantly reduces MI attack success.
Looser DP guarantees can be used without compromising privacy.
Subsampling outperforms stronger DP in defending against MI attacks.
Abstract
Differential Privacy (DP) is the de facto standard for reasoning about the privacy guarantees of a training algorithm. Despite the empirical observation that DP reduces the vulnerability of models to existing membership inference (MI) attacks, a theoretical underpinning as to why this is the case is largely missing in the literature. In practice, this means that models need to be trained with DP guarantees that greatly decrease their accuracy. In this paper, we provide a tighter bound on the positive accuracy (i.e., attack precision) of any MI adversary when a training algorithm provides -DP. Our bound informs the design of a novel privacy amplification scheme: an effective training set is sub-sampled from a larger set prior to the beginning of training. We find this greatly reduces the bound on MI positive accuracy. As a result, our scheme allows the use of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
