After-sales services during an asset's lifetime: collaborative planning of system upgrades

TL;DR

This paper develops a continuous-time decision support model for jointly optimizing system upgrades and overhauls during an asset's lifetime, considering costs, technological evolution, and collaboration benefits.

Contribution

It introduces a novel analytical framework for joint upgrade and overhaul planning, incorporating realistic cost structures and penalty effects.

Findings

Optimal upgrade policies depend on cost functions and penalties.

Joint upgrades with overhauls reduce overall costs.

More overhauls can lead to fewer upgrades.

Abstract

We consider a physical asset consisting of complex systems, where the systems may require upgrades during the lifetime of the asset. In practice, the asset owner and system supplier can make the upgrade decisions together, requiring a decision support model that can be jointly used to optimize the total benefit for both parties. Motivated by a real-life use case including an asset owner and a system supplier, we build a continuous-time model to optimize the upgrade decisions of a system during the fixed lifetime of the asset. In our model, we capture the key critical factors that drive the upgrade decisions: increasing functionality requirements due to evolving technology, age-dependent maintenance costs, a predetermined overhaul plan of the asset, and the lifetime of the asset. A system upgrade is less costly if it is executed jointly with an asset overhaul. We first analyze the case with no additional cost of upgrading outside an overhaul. We analytically characterize the structure of the optimal upgrade policy under various realistic assumptions that lead to different types of cost functions. We then use these results as a building block to characterize the optimal policy for a generalized cost function. When there is a penalty for upgrading outside an overhaul moment, we propose a dynamic programming approach that efficiently determines the optimal upgrade policy by using our analytical results. We also prove that as this penalty increases, the optimal policy can only change to one where the number of upgrades not jointly executed with overhauls is reduced. However, the optimal number of upgrades is a non-increasing function of this penalty. Also surprisingly, more overhauls may lead to a smaller number of upgrades under the optimal policy.