Reply to "Comment on 'Greybody radiation and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumblebee gravity model' "
Sara Kanzi, \.Izzet Sakall{\i}

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the conditions under which previous analyses of greybody factors and quasinormal modes in a Kerr-like black hole within Bumblebee gravity are valid, correcting earlier inaccuracies and presenting revised results.
Contribution
It provides a correction and clarification of the conditions necessary for valid greybody and quasinormal mode analyses in Bumblebee gravity black holes.
Findings
Revised calculations under correct conditions
Identification of the invalidity of previous Kerr-like solutions
Updated results aligning with the corrected conditions
Abstract
In our recent study Ref. [1]: Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 501 (2021) , the main goal was to reveal the Lorentz symmetry breaking (LSB) effect in the rotating black holes via the greybody factor and quasinormal mode analyzes. Ding et al. [2] Kerr-like black hole solution of the bumblebee gravity model used in our paper [1] has unquestionably proven by Maluf and Muniz [3] that it is wrong. We now explain under which condition the greybody factor and quasinormal mode analyzes performed in [1] become valid. We re-make the calculations according to the condition in question and present the new results in this reply.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
