Type II supernovae from the Carnegie Supernova Project-I. III. Understanding SN II diversity through correlations between physical and observed properties
L. Martinez, J. P. Anderson, M. C. Bersten, M. Hamuy, S., Gonz\'alez-Gait\'an, M. Orellana, M. Stritzinger, M. M. Phillips, C. P., Guti\'errez, C. Burns, T. de Jaeger, K. Ertini, G. Folatelli, F. F\"orster,, L. Galbany, P. Hoeflich, E. Y. Hsiao, N. Morrell, P. J. Pessi

TL;DR
This study analyzes correlations between physical and observed properties of Type II supernovae, highlighting explosion energy as a key factor influencing their diversity and emphasizing the importance of stellar evolution models.
Contribution
It presents new correlations between physical parameters and observed features of SNe II, especially emphasizing the role of explosion energy and the impact of different stellar evolution assumptions.
Findings
Explosion energy correlates with multiple observed parameters.
Higher luminosity SNe II have higher explosion energies and Ni masses.
Variations in stellar evolution models affect observed-supernova correlations.
Abstract
SNe II show great photometric and spectroscopic diversity which is attributed to the varied physical characteristics of their progenitor and explosion properties. In this study, the third of a series of papers where we analyse a sample of SNe II observed by the Carnegie Supernova Project-I, we present correlations between their observed and physical properties. Our analysis shows that explosion energy is the physical property that correlates with the highest number of parameters. We recover previously suggested relationships between the hydrogen-rich envelope mass and the plateau duration, and find that more luminous SNe II with higher expansion velocities, faster declining light curves, and higher Ni masses are consistent with higher energy explosions. In addition, faster declining SNe II are also compatible with more concentrated Ni in the inner regions of the ejecta. Positive trends…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
