Characterizing Error in Noncommutative Geometric Gait Analysis
Capprin Bass, Suresh Ramasamy, and Ross Hatton

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the errors in displacement estimates for robotic gait optimization, focusing on how low and high order terms affect accuracy and how parameter choices can mitigate these errors.
Contribution
It formulates existing displacement estimates, quantifies the impact of higher order terms, and shows how parameter variation can control these effects in gait analysis.
Findings
Low order terms significantly influence displacement estimates.
Parameter choices like body coordinate and gait diameter affect higher order effects.
Variation of parameters can effectively manage third order contributions.
Abstract
A key problem in robotic locomotion is in finding optimal shape changes to effectively displace systems through the world. Variational techniques for gait optimization require estimates of body displacement per gait cycle; however, these estimates introduce error due to unincluded high order terms. In this paper, we formulate existing estimates for displacement, and describe the contribution of low order terms to these estimates. We additionally describe the magnitude of higher (third) order effects, and identify that choice of body coordinate, gait diameter, and starting phase influence these effects. We demonstrate that variation of such parameters on two example systems (the differential drive car and Purcell swimmer) effectively manages third order contributions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
