On Resolving Problems with Conditionality and Its Implications for Characterizing Statistical Evidence
Michael Evans, Constantine Frangakis

TL;DR
This paper examines the conditionality principle in statistical evidence, addressing issues with multiple ancillaries and proposing a stable conditionality principle that ensures consistent inference.
Contribution
It introduces a new stable conditionality principle that limits conditioning to a unique maximal ancillary, resolving issues with traditional formulations.
Findings
Identifies problems with the standard conditionality principle.
Proposes a new stable conditionality principle.
Ensures consistent characterization of statistical evidence.
Abstract
The conditionality principle plays a key role in attempts to characterize the concept of statistical evidence. The standard version of considers a model and a derived conditional model, formed by conditioning on an ancillary statistic for the model, together with the data, to be equivalent with respect to their statistical evidence content. This equivalence is considered to hold for any ancillary statistic for the model but creates two problems. First, there can be more than one maximal ancillary in a given context and this leads to not being an equivalence relation and, as such, calls into question whether is a proper characterization of statistical evidence. Second, a statistic can change from ancillary to informative (in its marginal distribution) when another ancillary changes, from having one known distribution to having another known distribution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
