Reciprocity in Machine Learning
Mukund Sundararajan (Google), Walid Krichene (Google Research)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the reciprocity of influence and benefit in machine learning models, proposing measures to quantify outflows, inflows, and reciprocity, with initial theoretical and empirical findings suggesting some models are approximately reciprocal.
Contribution
It introduces new measures for assessing influence and reciprocity in machine learning, extending previous influence measures with theoretical and empirical analysis.
Findings
Some classes of models are approximately reciprocal under certain assumptions
Proposed measures effectively quantify influence flows and reciprocity
Open directions for further research are identified
Abstract
Machine learning is pervasive. It powers recommender systems such as Spotify, Instagram and YouTube, and health-care systems via models that predict sleep patterns, or the risk of disease. Individuals contribute data to these models and benefit from them. Are these contributions (outflows of influence) and benefits (inflows of influence) reciprocal? We propose measures of outflows, inflows and reciprocity building on previously proposed measures of training data influence. Our initial theoretical and empirical results indicate that under certain distributional assumptions, some classes of models are approximately reciprocal. We conclude with several open directions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies · Media Influence and Politics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
