Testing the boundaries: Normalizing Flows for higher dimensional data sets
Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez, Riccardo Torre

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the robustness and performance of various Normalizing Flows on high-dimensional toy datasets, highlighting their potential and limitations for complex data in High Energy Physics.
Contribution
It systematically assesses how different types of Normalizing Flows perform as data dimensionality increases, providing insights into their scalability and robustness.
Findings
Normalizing Flows maintain performance up to certain dimensions
Performance degrades as data dimensionality increases
Some NF architectures are more robust than others in high dimensions
Abstract
Normalizing Flows (NFs) are emerging as a powerful class of generative models, as they not only allow for efficient sampling, but also deliver, by construction, density estimation. They are of great potential usage in High Energy Physics (HEP), where complex high dimensional data and probability distributions are everyday's meal. However, in order to fully leverage the potential of NFs it is crucial to explore their robustness as data dimensionality increases. Thus, in this contribution, we discuss the performances of some of the most popular types of NFs on the market, on some toy data sets with increasing number of dimensions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTime Series Analysis and Forecasting · Data Analysis with R · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
