COVID-19 and Science Communication: The Recording and Reporting of Disease Mortality
Ognjen Arandjelovic

TL;DR
This paper examines how COVID-19 mortality is recorded and reported, revealing widespread misunderstandings and misrepresentations in UK and US media, which impact public perception and decision-making during the pandemic.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of mortality reporting practices and empirically demonstrates media misrepresentations and misunderstandings across different outlets and countries.
Findings
Media outlets often misrepresent COVID-19 mortality figures.
Greater coverage correlates with increased misrepresentation.
Lack of technical understanding in media affects public perception.
Abstract
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has brought science to the fore of the public discourse and considering the complexity of the issues involved, with it also the challenge of effective and informative science communication. A particularly contentious topic, in that it is both highly emotional in and of itself, as well as in that it sits at the nexus of the decision-making process regarding the handling of the pandemic, which has effected lockdowns, social behaviour measures, business closures, and others, concerns the recording and the reporting of the disease mortality. To clarify a point which has caused much controversy and anger in the public debate, the first part of the present article discusses the very fundamentals underlying the issue of causative attribution with regards to mortality, lays out the foundations of the statistical means of mortality estimation, and concretizes these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · COVID-19 epidemiological studies
