The Gaia-ESO Survey: The analysis of the hot-star spectra
R. Blomme, S. Daflon, M. Gebran, A. Herrero, A. Lobel, L. Mahy, F., Martins, T. Morel, S. R. Berlanas, A. Blazere, Y. Fremat, E. Gosset, J. Maiz, Apellaniz, W. Santos, T. Semaan, S. Simon-Diaz, D. Volpi, G. Holgado, F., Jimenez-Esteban, M. F. Nieva, N. Przybilla, G. Gilmore

TL;DR
The paper details the procedures and results of analyzing spectra of hot stars from the Gaia-ESO Survey, providing stellar parameters and abundances for thousands of stars across a wide temperature range.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analysis pipeline for hot-star spectra in GES, handling a large temperature range with multiple analysis nodes and quality checks.
Findings
Stellar parameters for 5584 stars were homogenized.
Abundances for key elements were determined for 292 stars.
Analysis covered 17,693 spectra of 6462 stars, mainly in open clusters.
Abstract
The Gaia-ESO Survey (GES) is a large public spectroscopic survey that has collected, over a period of 6 years, spectra of ~ 10^5 stars. This survey provides not only the reduced spectra, but also the stellar parameters and abundances resulting from the analysis of the spectra. The GES dataflow is organised in 19 working groups. Working group 13 (WG13) is responsible for the spectral analysis of the hottest stars (O, B and A type, with a formal cut-off of Teff > 7000 K) that were observed as part of GES. We present the procedures and techniques that have been applied to the reduced spectra, in order to determine the stellar parameters and abundances of these stars. The procedure used is similar to that of other working groups in GES. A number of groups (called `Nodes') each independently analyse the spectra, using their state-of-the-art techniques and codes. Specific for the analysis in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
