Bilimits in categories of partial maps
Jonathan Sterling

TL;DR
This paper proves that the category of dcpos and partial maps is closed under bilimits, clarifying a foundational aspect of constructive domain theory and enabling applications in models of axiomatic and synthetic domain theory.
Contribution
It provides a topos-valid proof of bilimit closure in the category of dcpos and partial maps, addressing gaps in previous constructive approaches.
Findings
Category of dcpos and partial maps is closed under bilimits.
Constructive proof of bilimit closure in topos setting.
Applications to models of axiomatic and synthetic domain theory.
Abstract
The closure of chains of embedding-projection pairs (ep-pairs) under bilimits in some categories of predomains and domains is standard and well-known. For instance, Scott's construction is well-known to produce directed bilimits of ep-pairs in the category of directed-complete partial orders, and de Jong and Escard\'o have formalized this result in the constructive domain theory of a topos. The explicit construcition of bilimits for categories of predomains and partial maps is considerably murkier as far as constructivity is concerned; most expositions employ the constructive taboo that every lift-algebra is free, reducing the problem to the construction of bilimits in a category of pointed domains and strict maps. An explicit construction of the bilimit is proposed in the dissertation of Claire Jones, but no proof is given so it remained unclear if the category of dcpos and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
