TL;DR
This paper evaluates various aggregation and hyperparameter selection methods in federated learning for brain tumor segmentation, aiming to improve convergence speed and performance in non-IID data scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces and compares different federated learning strategies and hyperparameter tuning methods specifically for brain tumor segmentation tasks.
Findings
Certain aggregation methods improve convergence speed.
Hyperparameter strategies enhance performance in non-IID settings.
Federated learning achieves competitive results without data sharing.
Abstract
Availability of large, diverse, and multi-national datasets is crucial for the development of effective and clinically applicable AI systems in the medical imaging domain. However, forming a global model by bringing these datasets together at a central location, comes along with various data privacy and ownership problems. To alleviate these problems, several recent studies focus on the federated learning paradigm, a distributed learning approach for decentralized data. Federated learning leverages all the available data without any need for sharing collaborators' data with each other or collecting them on a central server. Studies show that federated learning can provide competitive performance with conventional central training, while having a good generalization capability. In this work, we have investigated several federated learning approaches on the brain tumor segmentation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
