Quantization: History and Problems
Andrea Carosso

TL;DR
This paper reviews the historical development of quantization, discusses key theoretical challenges like the Groenewold-Van Hove theorem, and compares various quantization methods including Weyl and Geometric Quantization.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of the history, problems, and different approaches to quantization, highlighting the limitations of Dirac's original scheme.
Findings
Groenewold-Van Hove theorem shows Dirac's quantization map is inconsistent.
Weyl quantization and Geometric Quantization offer alternative frameworks.
Operator ordering and coordinate issues are central challenges in quantization.
Abstract
In this work, I explore the concept of quantization as a mapping from classical phase space functions to quantum operators. I discuss the early history of this notion of quantization with emphasis on the works of Schr\"odinger and Dirac, and how quantization fit into their overall understanding of quantum theory in the 1920's. Dirac, in particular, proposed a quantization map which should satisfy certain properties, including the property that quantum commutators should be related to classical Poisson brackets in a particular way. However, in 1946, Groenewold proved that Dirac's mapping was inconsistent, making the problem of defining a rigorous quantization map more elusive than originally expected. This result, known as the Groenewold-Van Hove theorem, is not often discussed in physics texts, but here I will give an account of the theorem and what it means for potential "corrections"…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhotonic and Optical Devices
