Heuristic computation of exact treewidth

TL;DR

This paper presents heuristic algorithms for computing tight upper and lower bounds on a graph's treewidth, improving solution quality and efficiency, especially on challenging instances, with a solver that provides certificates for bounds.

Contribution

The paper introduces novel heuristic algorithms for bounding treewidth from both sides, extending existing methods and providing a solver with certified bounds.

Findings

Effective on hard instances from PACE 2017

Produces tight bounds with certificates

Outperforms conventional solvers on challenging cases

Abstract

We are interested in computing the treewidth $\tw(G)$ of a given graph $G$. Our approach is to design heuristic algorithms for computing a sequence of improving upper bounds and a sequence of improving lower bounds, which would hopefully converge to $\tw(G)$ from both sides. The upper bound algorithm extends and simplifies Tamaki's unpublished work on a heuristic use of the dynamic programming algorithm for deciding treewidth due to Bouchitt\'{e} and Todinca. The lower bound algorithm is based on the well-known fact that, for every minor $H$ of $G$, we have $\tw(H) \leq \tw(G)$. Starting from a greedily computed minor $H_0$ of $G$, the algorithm tries to construct a sequence of minors $H_0$, $H_1$, \ldots $H_k$ with $\tw(H_i) < \tw(H_{i + 1})$ for $0 \leq i < k$ and hopefully $\tw(H_k) = \tw(G)$. We have implemented a treewidth solver based on this approach and have evaluated it on the bonus instances from the exact treewidth track of PACE 2017 algorithm implementation challenge. The results show that our approach is extremely effective in tackling instances that are hard for conventional solvers. Our solver has an additional advantage over conventional ones in that it attaches a compact certificate to the lower bound it computes.