Direct determination of the atomic mass difference of the pairs $^{76}$As-$^{76}$Se and $^{155}$Tb-$^{155}$Gd rules out $^{76}$As and $^{155}$Tb as possible candidates for electron (anti)neutrino mass measurements
Z. Ge, T. Eronen, A. de Roubin, J. Kostensalo, J. Suhonen, D. A., Nesterenko, O. Beliuskina, R. de Groote, C. Delafosse, S. Geldhof, W. Gins,, M. Hukkanen, A. Jokinen, A. Kankainen, J. Kotila, \'A. Koszor\'us, I. D., Moore, A. Raggio, S. Rinta-Antila, V. Virtanen, A. P. Weaver

TL;DR
This study precisely measured the atomic mass differences of specific decay pairs using advanced Penning trap techniques, conclusively ruling out certain isotopes as candidates for electron neutrino mass experiments due to their forbidden decay transitions.
Contribution
The paper provides the first direct, highly precise measurements of the $Q$ values for $^{76}$As and $^{155}$Tb decays, significantly improving accuracy and excluding these isotopes from neutrino mass research.
Findings
Measured $Q$ values with 12 and 57 times higher precision.
Confirmed decay transitions are energetically forbidden at over 4$\sigma$.
Excluded $^{76}$As and $^{155}$Tb as candidates for low-$Q$-value neutrino mass experiments.
Abstract
The first direct determination of the ground-state-to-ground-state values of the decay As Se and the electron-capture decay Tb Gd was performed utilizing the double Penning trap mass spectrometer JYFLTRAP. By measuring the atomic mass difference of the decay pairs via the phase-imaging ion-cyclotron-resonance (PI-ICR) technique, the values of As Se and Tb Gd were determined to be 2959.265(74) keV and 814.94(18) keV, respectively. The precision was increased relative to earlier measurements by factors of 12 and 57, respectively. The new values are 1.33 keV and 5 keV lower compared to the values adopted in the most recent Atomic Mass Evaluation 2020. With the newly determined ground-state-to-ground-state values combined with the excitation energy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
