Second Best, Third Worst, Fourth in Line
Steven Finch

TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of decomposable combinatorial structures, analyzing the distribution of cycle lengths and components, and compares theoretical predictions with experimental data to identify gaps and open questions.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the behavior of the exp-log class of combinatorial structures, especially regarding the second longest cycle and second smallest component.
Findings
The modal length of the second longest cycle in a random permutation is approximately 0.2350 times n.
The modal length of the second smallest component in a random mapping is 2.
The study highlights discrepancies between theory and experimental data, raising open questions.
Abstract
We investigate decomposable combinatorial labeled structures more fully, focusing on the exp-log class of type a=1 or 1/2. For instance, the modal length of the second longest cycle in a random n-permutation is (0.2350...)n, whereas the modal length of the second smallest component in a random n-mapping is 2 (conjecturally, given n>=434). As in earlier work, our approach is to establish how well existing theory matches experimental data and to raise open questions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Algorithms and Data Compression · semigroups and automata theory
