Adversarial Attacks and Defense Methods for Power Quality Recognition
Jiwei Tian, Buhong Wang, Jing Li, Zhen Wang, Mete Ozay

TL;DR
This paper explores vulnerabilities of power quality recognition systems to adversarial attacks, proposing new attack methods and an adversarial training defense to improve system robustness.
Contribution
It introduces signal-specific and universal signal-agnostic attack methods for power systems and demonstrates the effectiveness of adversarial training as a defense.
Findings
Signal-specific attack has less perturbation than FGSM.
Universal signal-agnostic attack achieves higher transfer rates.
Adversarial training enhances system robustness.
Abstract
Vulnerability of various machine learning methods to adversarial examples has been recently explored in the literature. Power systems which use these vulnerable methods face a huge threat against adversarial examples. To this end, we first propose a signal-specific method and a universal signal-agnostic method to attack power systems using generated adversarial examples. Black-box attacks based on transferable characteristics and the above two methods are also proposed and evaluated. We then adopt adversarial training to defend systems against adversarial attacks. Experimental analyses demonstrate that our signal-specific attack method provides less perturbation compared to the FGSM (Fast Gradient Sign Method), and our signal-agnostic attack method can generate perturbations fooling most natural signals with high probability. What's more, the attack method based on the universal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
