KamLAND's search for correlated low-energy electron antineutrinos with astrophysical neutrinos from IceCube
S. Abe, S. Asami, M. Eizuka, S. Futagi, A. Gando, Y. Gando, T. Gima,, A. Goto, T. Hachiya, K. Hata, K. Hosokawa, K. Ichimura, S. Ieki, H. Ikeda, K., Inoue, K. Ishidoshiro, Y. Kamei, N. Kawada, Y. Kishimoto, T. Kinoshita, M., Koga, M. Kurasawa, N. Maemura, T. Mitsui, H. Miyake

TL;DR
This study searched for low-energy electron antineutrinos in KamLAND coinciding with high-energy astrophysical neutrinos from IceCube, finding no significant excess and setting limits on neutrino fluence and luminosity.
Contribution
First combined analysis of KamLAND and IceCube data to constrain low-energy antineutrino emission from astrophysical sources.
Findings
No significant excess of low-energy antineutrinos observed.
Set limits on electron antineutrino fluence from 1.8 MeV to 100 MeV.
Placed a 90% CL limit on the isotropic thermal luminosity of TXS 0506+056.
Abstract
We report the results of a search for MeV-scale astrophysical neutrinos in KamLAND presented as an excess in the number of coincident neutrino interactions associated with the publicly available high-energy neutrino datasets from the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. We find no statistically significant excess in the number of observed low-energy electron antineutrinos in KamLAND, given a coincidence time window of 500s, 1,000s, 3,600s, and 10,000s around each of the IceCube neutrinos. We use this observation to present limits from 1.8 MeV to 100 MeV on the electron antineutrino fluence, assuming a mono-energetic flux. We then compare the results to several astrophysical measurements performed by IceCube and place a limit at the 90% confidence level on the electron antineutrino isotropic thermal luminosity from the TXS 0506+056 blazar.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
