Can We Talk? An Exploratory Study of Gender and Network Ties in a Local Government Setting
Leisha DeHart-Davis, Nicole Humphrey, Travis A. Whetsell

TL;DR
This study investigates how gender and organizational roles influence discussion network ties among municipal employees, revealing gender-based differences in tie formation and perceptions within a local government setting.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on gender dynamics and network homophily in organizational communication, highlighting the role of gender and position in discussion ties.
Findings
Women supervisors are more likely to initiate discussion ties.
Women are more likely to receive discussion ties.
Gender homophily influences discussion network structure.
Abstract
We explore the influence of gender and formal organizational status on the formation of discussion ties. Network data, gathered through surveying employees from a municipal organization in the United States, garnered a 92% response rate (n=143). Results of exponential random graph modeling indicate women supervisors are more likely to send discussion ties, while women in general are more likely to receive discussion ties. These exploratory results suggest women may be perceived as more approachable for work discussions, but not as supervisors. Finally, the results identified a consistent homophily effect of gender in the discussion network.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPublic Policy and Administration Research · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Social Media and Politics
